Conducted by: Dewa, L. H., Broyd, J., Hira, R., Dudley, A., Hafferty, J. D., Bates, R., & Aylin, P. (2023)
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 23, 946 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05437-w
Background
Technology has the potential to remotely monitor patient safety in real-time which helps staff, and without disturbing the patient. However, staff and patients’ perspectives on using passive remote monitoring within an inpatient setting are lacking. The study aimed to explore stakeholders’ perspectives about using Oxehealth passive monitoring technology within a high-secure forensic psychiatric hospital in the UK as part of a wider mixed-methods service evaluation.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff and patients with experience of using Oxehealth technology face-to-face within a private room in Broadmoor Hospital. We applied thematic analysis to the data of each participant group separately. Themes and sub-themes were integrated, finalised, and presented in a thematic map. Design, management, and analysis were meaningfully informed by both staff and patients.
Results
Twenty-four participants were interviewed (n = 12 staff, n = 12 patients). There were seven main themes: detecting deterioration and improving health and safety, “big brother syndrome”, privacy and dignity, knowledge and understanding, acceptance, barriers to use and practice issues, and future changes needed. Oxehealth technology was considered acceptable to both staff and patients if the technology was used to detect deterioration and improve patient safety providing patient’s privacy was not invaded. However, overall acceptance was lower when knowledge and understanding of the technology and its camera were limited. Most patients could not understand why both physical checks through bedroom windows and Oxehealth were needed to monitor patients, whilst staff felt Oxehealth should not replace physical checks of patients to reassure staff on patient safety.
Conclusions
Oxehealth technology is considered viable and acceptable by most staff and patients but there is still some concern about its possible intrusive nature. However, more support and education for new patients and staff to better understand how Oxehealth works in the short- and long-term could be introduced to further improve acceptability. A feasibility study or pilot trial to compare the impact of Oxehealth with and without physical checks may be needed.